Abstract
This narrative review critically examined the ethical challenges associated with euthanasia, focusing on the tension between patient autonomy and specific care contexts. Six studies published between 2015 and 2025 were analyzed, selected from the PubMed database, addressing euthanasia in vulnerable populations (minors, patients with dementia, prisoners) and from various professional perspectives (nursing, intensive care). The analysis revealed that although autonomy is a fundamental bioethical principle, its practical application faces significant limitations in vulnerable scenarios, requiring strict criteria to ensure ethical decisions. Additionally, the role of healthcare professionals emerged as critical mediators in the decision-making process, facing dilemmas between preserving life and respecting the patient’s will. The review also demonstrated that the traditional four bioethical principles are insufficient to fully address the complexity involved, indicating the need for complementary ethical approaches such as the ethics of care and solidarity. The findings highlight the importance of specific guidelines, ongoing ethical training for professionals, and further empirical research to deepen the understanding of euthanasia’s impact in different clinical contexts.
References
BEAUCHAMP, T. L.; CHILDRESS, J. F. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. 7. ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2013.
CLIFTON, S. Disability and the complexity of choice in the ethics of abortion and voluntary euthanasia. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, v. 46, n. 4, p. 431-450, 2021. DOI: 10.1093/jmp/jhab008.
CUMAN, G.; GASTMANS, C. Minors and euthanasia: a systematic review of argument-based ethics literature. European Journal of Pediatrics, v. 176, n. 7, p. 837-847, 2017. DOI: 10.1007/s00431-017-2934-8.
ESPERICUETA, L. Euthanasia in detention and the ethics of caring solidarity: a case study of the ‘Tarragona Gunman’. Bioethics, v. 38, n. 8, p. 713-721, 2024. DOI: 10.1111/bioe.13325.
GILLIGAN, C. In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1982.
GROENEWOUD, A. S. et al. The ethics of euthanasia in dementia: a qualitative content analysis of case summaries (2012-2020). Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, v. 70, n. 6, p. 1704-1716, 2022. DOI: 10.1111/jgs.17707.
PESUT, B. et al. Nursing and euthanasia: a narrative review of the nursing ethics literature. Nursing Ethics, v. 27, n. 1, p. 152-167, 2020. DOI: 10.1177/0969733019845127.
RACHELS, J. The End of Life: Euthanasia and Morality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986.
SINGER, P. Practical Ethics. 2. ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.
TRAPPE, H. J. Ethics in intensive care and euthanasia: with respect to inactivating defibrillators at the end of life in terminally ill patients. Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin, v. 112, n. 3, p. 214-221, 2017. DOI: 10.1007/s00063-015-0119-7.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Advanced Clinical Implementation and Applied Medical Innovations
